Skip to main content

LUNA cryptocurrency wipeout and UST Stablecoin Depegs in less than 3 days

In less than 3 days, the UST Stablecoin and LUNA cryptocurrency went from over $50 Billion to less than 0.  This was the 3rd largest stablecoin.

https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/terra-luna ~$30 Billion

luna market cap chart

https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/terra-usd ~$20 Billion


UST market cap chart

Was it an Cyber-Attack? Hack? Ponzi?

  • Cyber Attack? No indication of this, Actually from everything said so far the blockchain behaved as it should have with no network outages from cyber-attack (This actually shows that the technology used to implement is now battle tested - It is/was a Cosmos IBC (Inter-Block-chain Communication protocol)
  • Hack? No indication of this.  No keys were stolen.
  • Ponzi? Not exactly, it wasn't promising any type of yield and paying off older investors with new investors.  Although Anchor Protocol (https://www.anchorprotocol.com/) it is a bit more grey (this was the protocol promising 20% yield on UST)
  • What happened? Most opinion is that it was a currency attack where more than $3 Billion of UST was used to force the treasury to defend the peg when the treasury didn't have enough collateral (causing a viscous cycle of selling LUNA to try and defend the peg, but being below $1 caused a feedback loop upon itself).  Who caused this and why? well time will tell to unfold the mystery, but meanwhile many investors lost their shirts.  This definitely hurt a lot of people and the long term affect will probably mean tighter regulation for the industry.  This is also the first time that we've seen a major blockchain just voluntarily halt.

Take away lessons: 

  • Protocols/Investments will be attacked given enough incentive 

  • Know what you are investing in.  Even though this was considered a "Stablecoin".  It is important to understand how the peg is maintained.  In this case, it was believed that there would be enough liquidity to meet any demand managed by an algorithm.   

  • To stay up to date in this development, I believe the team is updating via twitter: https://twitter.com/terra_money    

  • Broader take away: Risk Management, especially in crypto because it is so fast you have to be prepared for wild swings.    

    • Best way is be very mindful of how much exposure you have and realize the more speculative the asset the higher chance it can go to zero.
    • The other way is to use options or derivatives to control risk, but since this is such a nascent product, I don't think there were any viable options.  Currently it looks like Bitcoin and maybe Ethereum have liquid enough options to do any type of strategic risk management.
    • Do you add or dump?  I guess the question really should be from this point forward do you still believe in the asset.  And if so, then for the amount you have, is the risk too high? or do you want to increase your exposure?
    • One rule of thumb is to not let any individual position be more than 2-5% of your portfolio.  With crypto being about 3 to 5 times more volatile, people may want to consider less like 0.5% to 1%
    • This definitely makes me want to re-assess how much exposure is appropriate for crypto for myself

     

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

using options to recover from a big move against me when buy a stock for shareholder benefits - RCL attempt to repair position

Shareholder Benefits Owning shares of a company can entitle you to special benefits when consuming products or services.  For example, Royal Caribbean Cruises (RCL) provides $100 onboard credit per Stateroom on Sailings of 6-13 nights.  With an upcoming cruise booked and most of my portfolio in cash, I decided to take advantage of this offer.  I've done a few cruises in the past and definitely enjoyed Royal Caribbean, especially having young children; and can imagine I will take more cruises with them in the future. The Purchase of Shares I didn't do any deep Fundamental or Technical Analysis, but looked at a 5 year chart seeing the stock priced at $135 before the COVID-19 pandemic, and during the pandemic reached a low of around $24.  When I purchased the shares it was $40 and dropped in price for the 2 preceding days.  Since I bought at the end of the day, I figured I would sell a call option (overwrite) the next day as the volatility was high around 85%....
Post a Comment
Read more

How does theta change through time when selling strangles? SPY, META, IEF

What is Theta? Theta is amount of value that an option position changes each day due to the passage of time.   For example, SPY closing at 411.99 and Implied Volatility (IVOL) 22.58% SPY 9/16/22 (47 DTE) Strike delta price theta 376P -0.15 3.12 -0.09 440C 0.15 1.97 -0.07 The above table shows that the 376 Put has a theta of -0.09.  This means the option will lose $9 a day (each contract represents 100 shares so -0.09 x 100 = -$9. To standardize, the theta/price is a ratio that can be used.  In our example  -$9/411.99 => -0.02%. Table of Theta for 15 delta Strangles for SPY, META, and IEF Information was pulled from market data on 7/31/2022 taking the initial strikes and seeing how the data changes for different upcoming Days to Expiration (DTE).  (15 delta Strangles for SPY correspond to 376P and 440C). SPY is the most active ETF for S&P 500. IEF is an ETF of 10 year Bonds. META is the ticker for the company formerly known as Facebook. Analysis 1) T...
Post a Comment
Read more

Trading Ethereum (ETH) merge? Are the CME Ethereum Options on Micro Futures markets reasonable?

Ethereum Merge Brief Background Most people are aware of Proof-of-Work (consensus mechanism to validate blocks on the blockchain - this is done with miners solving math problems (work)).  Ethereum, the second largest Crypto Currency is moving from a Proof-of-Work to Proof-of-Stake (consensus mechanism that validates blocks through a validator (like voting) system).   The main reason for doing this is to get away from miners wasting electricity solving useless math problems to a system that doesn't waste energy on miners.   One argument against moving to Proof-of-Stake, is that it becomes more about controlling a large number of validator nodes (so in a sense, the larger validators have more say, whereas Proof-Of-Work rewards are more 'fair' as it is randomly distributed. Either way you look at it being positive or negative, it is an event that can be traded as the current estimated merge date (the date the blockchain switches from Proof-of-Work to Proof-of-Stake...
Post a Comment
Read more